Samsung Electronics has discovered a new synthesis method which it claims is not only groundbreaking but will also speed up the commercialisation of Graphene – something that wasn’t possible up until now.

Graphene, which was discovered back in 2004, is known as the thinnest material as well as a good conductor of electricity and heat. Graphene has 100 times greater electron mobility than silicon – the most common material found in semiconductors today.

However, use of Graphene in mainstream electronic products wasn’t possible for the lack of cost effective commercial production techniques. Previous attempts to grow large area wafer didn’t bear fruits as Graphene lost some of its properties when synthesized.

“This is one of the most significant breakthroughs in graphene research in history,” said the laboratory leaders at Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology [SAIT]’s Lab.

“We expect this discovery to accelerate the commercialization of graphene, which could unlock the next era of consumer electronic technology.”

SAIT has been working in partnership with Sungkyungkwan University’s School of Advanced Materials Science and Engineering and that’s where the researchers found the new method of synthesizing large area, single crystal wafer scale graphene.

Researchers revealed that the new method doesn’t use the original multi-crystal synthesis method but instead uses a single-crystal on a semiconductor that repeatedly synthesizes.

Samsung claims that the higher durability of Graphene, its high heat conductibility and flexibility makes it an ideal candidate and material for “use in flexible displays, wearables and other next generation electronic devices.”

Well done Samsung , at last wearables

THE M O S T TELLING FACTUAL STATEMENT IN THE SAMSUNG GRAPHENE-PREPARATION

BREAKTHROUGH ARTICLE/PRESS RELEASE/MEDIA HYPE/P.R./ SPIN-DOCTORING/”SHOW0-BIZ”/…/”BUSH-WAAA-…—AAAH!!!/AKA

B.S.!!!/

“FULL OF ‘FURY’; SIGNIFYING (MOST-PROBABLY) ABSOLUTELY NOTHING”!!!

IS:

“This doesn’t mean that we’ll suddenly

see computer chips made out of graphene instead of silicon, though — we still

haven’t found a way of giving graphene a bandgap, which means it’s actually

fairly useless as far as digital computing goes.”

ASIDE FROM BAND-GAP GENERATION AND REPRODUCIBLE FABRICATION IS THE BOSE-EINSTEIN

CONDENSATION( ) “BAND”-GAP OF ANTONOFF[ENGLERT{2007

PHYSICS NOBEL-PRIZE!!!}-BROUT-HIGGS]-SIEGEL SIMPLE ALGEBRAIC-INVERSION OF

CLASSIC BUT QUANTUM(!!!) LOG-LAW NEWCOMB(1881)-POINCARE(1912)-WEYL(1914;1916)-BENFORD(1938)-RAIMI(1969)-NIGRINI-HILL(1995)-…

TO YIELD

O N L Y BOSE-EINSTEIN QUANTUM-STATISTICS(BEC)

WITH INHERENT INTRINSIC GAP-FUL BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION!!!(BEC!!!)

AS T H E

ACHILLES-HEEL OF DIGITAL!!!-COMPUTING/…/DIGITAL(!!!) ANYTHING!!!/ EVERYTHING!!!:

ITS VERY

D I G I T S ! ! !

WHY???

[FOR: CONSULTING!, LICENSING!!; SALE!!!;

CATEGORYSEMANTICS@GMAIL.COM; NORTONSIEGEL@GMAIL.COM;

c/o: USA+(206) 733-0504]

“CYBER-“SECURITY”??? / CYBER-TERRORISM! / CYBER- W A R ! ! !

VIA

SIEGEL-ANTONOFF[BROUT-ENGLERT(2013 PHYSICS NOBEL-PRIZE!!!)-HIGGS]-…

D I G I T!!! (S!!!)– P H Y S I C S !!!

INTERSECTION/ BOSE-EINSTEIN(!!!) QUANTUM-STATISTICS(BEQS) =

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION(!!!)(BEC)!!!/ UNION WITH

BARABASI-ALBERT-BIANCOMI(BAB) NE T W O R K (S) [EVOLVING/”COMPLEX”)- P H Y S

I C S !!!

Network-Physics(NP) Barabasi-Albert-Bianconi Bose-Einstein

Quantum-Statistics Bose-Einstein Condensation(BEC)

Intersection/Union With

Euler-Newcomb-Weyl-Benford-Kac-Hill Digits Logarithm-Law Algebraic-Inversion

GapFUL BEC Commonality Hill(1995) Proof Via SCALE-INVARIANCE Commonality:

DIGITAL(#)-VULNERABILITY versus FAULT-TOLERANT ANALOG-Networks; (so

miscalled)

“Computational”-“Complexity” Cook-Levin theorem

REDUCIBILITY/COMPLETENESS

Siegel-Antonoff-Smith[AMS Joint Mtg.(2002)-Abs.973-60-124]

digits logarithmic- (Newcomb[Am. J. Math.4,39(1881)]-Weyl[Goett.

Nachr.(1914);

Math. Ann. 77,313(1916)]-Benford[J. Am. Phil. Soc. 78,115(1938)]-Kac[The

Mathematics of

Statistical-Reasoning(1955)])-“NeWBe”/”OLDbe”)-law

algebraic-inversion

to ONLY Bose-Einstein Quantum-Statistics with digit d = 0 gapFUL

Bose-Einstein-CONDENSATION(BEC): digits are quanta are (ONLY) bosons because

quanta can be bosons always were digits!!!

Hill[Proc. Am. Math.Soc., 123,3,887(1995)] pure-mathematics

proof(finally!!!)

via units-invariance = logarithm-function (1,0)-fixed-point base-invariance

=

SCALE-INVARIANCE connects with Barabasi-Bianconi-Albert[Science

287,2115a(2000); Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. B 15, 313-320 (2001); Phys. Rev.

Letters

86,5632(2001); Rev. Mod. Phys. 74,47(2002);…]

“scale-free”/SCALE-INVARIANCE networks-physics: evolving

complex-graph-theory 1:1-mapping onto statistical-physics/mechanics!!!

Synthesis reveals electromagnetic-pulse(EMP)-like SEVERE VULNERABILITY of

ONLY/ALL PURELY-DIGITAL-networks(VS. FAULT-TOLERANT ANALOG-networks

INvulnerability) via Barabasi-Bianconi-Albert “Network-Physics”

scale-free SCALE-INVARIANCE relative-“statics”(VS.

dynamics-[Willinger-Alderson-Doyle(Not.AMS(5/09)]-]critique)!!! (so called)

“Quantum-computing is simple-arithmetic(sans division/factorization);

algorithmic-complexities: INtractibility/UNdecidability/INefficiency/

NON-computability/HARDNESS(so MIScalled)

“noise”-induced-phase-transitions(NITS) ACCELERATION: Cook-Levin

theorem Reducibility is Renormalization-(Semi)-Group fixed-points;

number-Randomness DEFINITION via WHAT? Query(VS. Goldreich[Not.AMS(2002)]

How?

mea culpa)can ONLY be Maxwell-Boltzmann classical-statistics

“infinitely-hot-plasma” versus digit-clumping

“NeWBe”-logarithm-law NON-random BEC; Modular-arithmetic

Congruences

= Signal X Noise PRODUCTS = clock-model; NON-Shor

Holthaus-Page-Weiss[Physica

A,341,586(04)] BEC logarithmic-law inversion factorization: Watkins

number-theory intersection/connections to statistical-physics/mechanics);

P=/=NP TRIVIAL Proof: Euclid!!! [(So Miscalled) computational-complexity(VS.

Siegel physics-“complexity” is UTTER-SIMPLICITY!!!)

jargonial-obfurscation(J-O) obviation via classic Greek plane-geometry.]

THE M O S T TELLING FACTUAL STATEMENT IN THE SAMSUNG GRAPHENE-PREPARATION

BREAKTHROUGH ARTICLE/PRESS RELEASE/MEDIA HYPE/P.R./ SPIN-DOCTORING/”SHOW0-BIZ”/…/”BUSH-WAAA-…—AAAH!!!/AKA

B.S.!!!/

“FULL OF ‘FURY’; SIGNIFYING (MOST-PROBABLY) ABSOLUTELY NOTHING”!!!

IS:

“This doesn’t mean that we’ll suddenly

see computer chips made out of graphene instead of silicon, though — we still

haven’t found a way of giving graphene a bandgap, which means it’s actually

fairly useless as far as digital computing goes.”

ASIDE FROM BAND-GAP GENERATION AND REPRODUCIBLE FABRICATION IS THE BOSE-EINSTEIN

CONDENSATION( ) “BAND”-GAP OF ANTONOFF[ENGLERT{2007

PHYSICS NOBEL-PRIZE!!!}-BROUT-HIGGS]-SIEGEL SIMPLE ALGEBRAIC-INVERSION OF

CLASSIC BUT QUANTUM(!!!) LOG-LAW NEWCOMB(1881)-POINCARE(1912)-WEYL(1914;1916)-BENFORD(1938)-RAIMI(1969)-NIGRINI-HILL(1995)-…

TO YIELD

O N L Y BOSE-EINSTEIN QUANTUM-STATISTICS(BEC)

WITH INHERENT INTRINSIC GAP-FUL BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION!!!(BEC!!!)

AS T H E

ACHILLES-HEEL OF DIGITAL!!!-COMPUTING/…/DIGITAL(!!!) ANYTHING!!!/ EVERYTHING!!!:

ITS VERY

D I G I T S ! ! !

WHY???

[FOR: CONSULTING!, LICENSING!!; SALE!!!;

CATEGORYSEMANTICS@GMAIL.COM; NORTONSIEGEL@GMAIL.COM;

c/o: USA+(206) 733-0504]

“CYBER-“SECURITY”??? / CYBER-TERRORISM! / CYBER- W A R ! ! !

VIA

SIEGEL-ANTONOFF[BROUT-ENGLERT(2013 PHYSICS NOBEL-PRIZE!!!)-HIGGS]-…

D I G I T!!! (S!!!)– P H Y S I C S !!!

INTERSECTION/ BOSE-EINSTEIN(!!!) QUANTUM-STATISTICS(BEQS) =

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION(!!!)(BEC)!!!/ UNION WITH

BARABASI-ALBERT-BIANCOMI(BAB) NE T W O R K (S) [EVOLVING/”COMPLEX”)- P H Y S

I C S !!!

Network-Physics(NP) Barabasi-Albert-Bianconi Bose-Einstein

Quantum-Statistics Bose-Einstein Condensation(BEC)

Intersection/Union With

Euler-Newcomb-Weyl-Benford-Kac-Hill Digits Logarithm-Law Algebraic-Inversion

GapFUL BEC Commonality Hill(1995) Proof Via SCALE-INVARIANCE Commonality:

DIGITAL(#)-VULNERABILITY versus FAULT-TOLERANT ANALOG-Networks; (so

miscalled)

“Computational”-“Complexity” Cook-Levin theorem

REDUCIBILITY/COMPLETENESS

Siegel-Antonoff-Smith[AMS Joint Mtg.(2002)-Abs.973-60-124]

digits logarithmic- (Newcomb[Am. J. Math.4,39(1881)]-Weyl[Goett.

Nachr.(1914);

Math. Ann. 77,313(1916)]-Benford[J. Am. Phil. Soc. 78,115(1938)]-Kac[The

Mathematics of

Statistical-Reasoning(1955)])-“NeWBe”/”OLDbe”)-law

algebraic-inversion

to ONLY Bose-Einstein Quantum-Statistics with digit d = 0 gapFUL

Bose-Einstein-CONDENSATION(BEC): digits are quanta are (ONLY) bosons because

quanta can be bosons always were digits!!!

Hill[Proc. Am. Math.Soc., 123,3,887(1995)] pure-mathematics

proof(finally!!!)

via units-invariance = logarithm-function (1,0)-fixed-point base-invariance

=

SCALE-INVARIANCE connects with Barabasi-Bianconi-Albert[Science

287,2115a(2000); Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. B 15, 313-320 (2001); Phys. Rev.

Letters

86,5632(2001); Rev. Mod. Phys. 74,47(2002);…]

“scale-free”/SCALE-INVARIANCE networks-physics: evolving

complex-graph-theory 1:1-mapping onto statistical-physics/mechanics!!!

Synthesis reveals electromagnetic-pulse(EMP)-like SEVERE VULNERABILITY of

ONLY/ALL PURELY-DIGITAL-networks(VS. FAULT-TOLERANT ANALOG-networks

INvulnerability) via Barabasi-Bianconi-Albert “Network-Physics”

scale-free SCALE-INVARIANCE relative-“statics”(VS.

dynamics-[Willinger-Alderson-Doyle(Not.AMS(5/09)]-]critique)!!! (so called)

“Quantum-computing is simple-arithmetic(sans division/factorization);

algorithmic-complexities: INtractibility/UNdecidability/INefficiency/

NON-computability/HARDNESS(so MIScalled)

“noise”-induced-phase-transitions(NITS) ACCELERATION: Cook-Levin

theorem Reducibility is Renormalization-(Semi)-Group fixed-points;

number-Randomness DEFINITION via WHAT? Query(VS. Goldreich[Not.AMS(2002)]

How?

mea culpa)can ONLY be Maxwell-Boltzmann classical-statistics

“infinitely-hot-plasma” versus digit-clumping

“NeWBe”-logarithm-law NON-random BEC; Modular-arithmetic

Congruences

= Signal X Noise PRODUCTS = clock-model; NON-Shor

Holthaus-Page-Weiss[Physica

A,341,586(04)] BEC logarithmic-law inversion factorization: Watkins

number-theory intersection/connections to statistical-physics/mechanics);

P=/=NP TRIVIAL Proof: Euclid!!! [(So Miscalled) computational-complexity(VS.

Siegel physics-“complexity” is UTTER-SIMPLICITY!!!)

jargonial-obfurscation(J-O) obviation via classic Greek plane-geometry.]