Cigarette smoking costs Manitoba’s publicly-funded health care system an extra $244 million a year, according to a new in-depth study from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy at the University of Manitoba: $147 million in hospital costs, $40 million in prescription drugs funded by Pharmacare, $39 million in extra visits to the doctor, and $18 million for smoking-related cancer care. These results do not include costs associated with second-hand smoke.
The Cost of Smoking: A Manitoba Study linked 45,000 Manitobans’ survey responses on smoking with records of their use of health services to measure the excess burden that smoking places on Manitoba’s health care system. The study used information on health service use spanning 23 years, from 1989 to 2012.
The report shows that the percentage of Manitobans who smoke is steadily dropping. In 1989, 22 per cent of Manitobans smoked daily and 65 per cet were casual or former smokers. By 2011, these numbers were 14 per cent and 42 per cent, respectively.
Daily smokers and former daily smokers had the highest use of health care services, and account for most of the excess cost burden. However, even casual smokers were found to use more health care services than non-smokers.
Smokers were 10 times more likely to develop specific forms of cancer (such as lung or throat cancers) known to be connected to tobacco use—about 580 new cases each year.
Some of the study’s most important findings were about the impact of smoking on life expectancy. Other research has estimated that smoking can shorten life expectancy by between 5 and 10 years. Using more rigorous methods, MCHP’s study found that having ever smoked reduced life expectancy by only about 1.5 years, and that smoking every day reduced life expectancy by about 2 years. These findings are similar to a comparable study done in Ontario which used similar methods. This difference is still significant, but it means that most smokers will live into their late 70s or early 80s. However, even though smokers may live almost as long as non-smokers, they aren’t aging well. They are sicker and use more health care than non-smokers. And because they’re living almost as long, their higher rates of health service use are not offset by premature death.
“This finding should change how we think about the effect of smoking on health. It isn’t that if you smoke you will die a lot younger—but you will be sicker, and have lower quality of life,” says Nathan Nickel, one of the study’s lead authors.
According to Nickel, “our cost estimates are probably on the low side. Smoking rates have dropped significantly in the past 20 years, and we calculated costs based on how many people were smoking in 2011. So our cost estimates would have been even higher for previous years. We also weren’t able to measure the effect of second-hand smoke, loss of economic productivity, or the cost of income assistance due to illness.”
