fbpx

#Science

City grime could be contributing to pollution, study shows

By  | 

A study may have stumbled upon a missing link in our understanding of pollution as it suggests that city grime could possibly be a major contributor to urban pollution – something that hasn’t been considered till date.

In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers have established that natural sunlight triggers chemical reaction that causes the release of smog-forming nitrogen oxide compounds from the grime that typically coats buildings, statues and other outdoor surfaces in urban areas.

The study, presented at the 250th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS), the world’s largest scientific society, contains findings from field studies in Leipzig, Germany, and Toronto, Canada,

James Donaldson, Ph.D., explains that currently scientists do not take into consideration recycling of nitrogen oxides and potentially other compounds from building surfaces. Donaldson said that their field studies have shown that this is actually happening in real world and though they are not aware about the extent of this, he believes that it could be quite significant contributor to air pollution in cities.

 A study using glass beads to collect grime (above) shows that compounds can recycle from grime back into the air and contribute to pollution. Credit: Alyson Baergen


A study using glass beads to collect grime (above) shows that compounds can recycle from grime back into the air and contribute to pollution. Credit: Alyson Baergen

Donaldson pegs urban grime as a mixture of thousands of chemical compounds released into the atmosphere by automobiles, factories and a host of other sources. Among these compounds are nitrogen oxides. When in the air, these compounds may combine with other air pollutants — known as volatile organic compounds — to produce ozone, which is the main component of smog. But the scientific community has long believed that nitrogen oxides become inactive when they are trapped in grime and settle on a surface and do not contribute to pollution.

This is not what Donaldson and his colleagues at the University of Toronto found. During their tests, the results they obtained were inconsistent with the widely believed theory. In lab based studies, Donaldson and his team had found that nitrate anions disappeared from grime at faster rates than could be explained by wash-off due to rainfall. Further, they also found that nitrate disappeared from grime 10,000 times faster than from a water-based solution when both were exposed to artificial sunlight.

This was not it! in yet another study, they exposed grime to either artificial sunlight or kept it in the dark. The grime exposed to a “solar simulator” shed more nitrates than the grime left in the dark, suggesting that light can chemically convert nitrogen compounds back into active forms that can return to the atmosphere.

All these results motivated them to undertake field trials and working with colleagues in Germany, Donaldson set up a six-week study in Leipzig and a similar year-long study in Toronto. The researchers placed grime collectors containing glass beads throughout both cities. The beads create more surface area for grime to gather on than a flat surface, such as a window.

Some of the collection devices were left in the sun; others were intentionally put in the shade, but had adequate air flow so that grime could collect on their surfaces. The Toronto study is ongoing and the data are still being analyzed. But in Leipzig, the researchers found that grime in shaded areas contained 10 percent more nitrates than grime exposed to natural sunlight, which was consistent with the team’s laboratory findings.

“If our suspicions are correct, it means that the current understanding of urban air pollution is missing a big chunk of information,” Donaldson says. “In our work, we are showing that there is the potential for significant recycling of nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere from grime, which could give rise to greater ozone creation.”

Interestingly, Donaldson notes that Leipzig has far more grime than Toronto, based on the amount of material gathered at collection stations in both cities so far. This difference could have a significant influence on the city’s air quality. “The fact that Leipzig appears to have 20 times more grime than Toronto suggests that there is a potential for 20 times more recycling of nitrogen oxides into the local atmosphere,” Donaldson says.

To test this idea, his team hopes to conduct field experiments in someplace that is “really grubby” and someplace that is “really clean.” They also plan to examine the effects of humidity, grime levels and various amounts of illumination on the recycling of nitrates back into the atmosphere.